Adaptive photon extraction improves accuracy in bathymetry, indicating robust signal identification capabilities.
The ATL03 data from the photon-counting LiDAR onboard the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) holds substantial potential for shallow-water bathymetry due to its high sensitivity and broad spatial coverage. However, distinguishing signal photons from noise in low-photon-density and complex terrain environments remains a significant challenge. This study proposes an adaptive photon extraction algorithm based on linear feature analysis, incorporating resolution adjustment, segmented Gaussian fitting, and linear feature-based signal identification. To address the reduction in signal photon density with increasing water depth, the method employs a depth-dependent adaptive neighborhood search radius, which dynamically expands into deeper regions to ensure reliable local feature computation. Experiments using eight ICESat-2 datasets demonstrated that the proposed method achieves average precision and recall values of 0.977 and 0.958, respectively, with an F1 score of 0.967 and an overall accuracy of 0.972. The extracted bathymetric depths demonstrated strong agreement with the reference Continuously Updated Digital Elevation Model (CUDEM), achieving a coefficient of determination of 0.988 and a root mean square error of 0.829 m. Compared to conventional methods, the proposed approach significantly improves signal photon extraction accuracy, adaptability, and parameter stability, particularly in sparse photon and complex terrain scenarios. In comparison with the DBSCAN algorithm, the proposed method achieves a 30.0% increase in precision, 17.3% improvement in recall, 24.3% increase in F1 score, and 22.2% improvement in overall accuracy. These findings confirm the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed algorithm for ICESat-2 shallow-water bathymetry applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: