Experiment demonstrates pilot performance and workload differences using monocular HWD versus HUD in low-visibility landings, suggesting usability concerns with EFVS.
An experiment was conducted to determine whether pilot performance, workload, and usability during low-visibility approaches and landings differed depending on whether pilots flew with a HUD or a monocular HWD, as well as whether they flew with or without an Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS). Eleven Part 121 flight crews flew SA CAT I approach and landing scenarios using a HUD and a monocular HWD with and without an EFVS in a Boeing 737 Level D-equivalent simulator. Findings suggest that a monocular HWD may not have a significant impact on a pilot’s ability to manage the flightpath during a routine SA CAT I operation with or without an EFVS; however, the monocular HWD elevated pilot workload. Pilots reported that the EFVS enhanced their awareness of the runway environment when transitioning from instrument to visual flight references; however, it was reported to interfere with natural runway visibility when transitioning to landing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Newton et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: