Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review compares methods for automated inference of components and factors in mixture of factor analysers, suggesting new approaches.
Mixture of factor analysers (MFA) are popular tools for dimension reduction and model-based clustering. The conventional method of parameter estimation for MFA is via maximum likelihood using the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. This typically assumes the number of components ( g ) and the number of factors ( q ) to be known a priori , which are often not known in practice. This article reviews different approaches for automatically inferring g and/or q from the data. A hybrid method, incremental automated MFA (IAMFA), is also proposed. We conduct a systematic comparison of these methods using simulated data and analyse their relative performance across various scenarios, looking at their ability to infer g and q correctly, the general model fit, clustering accuracy, and computation time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davey et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: