Experimental intervention reduced pseudo-psychology and other unsubstantiated beliefs, suggesting wider implications.
Pseudo-psychological beliefs that psychologists can read others’ minds impede accurate understanding of psychology. This study examined whether trick exposure of mental magic reduces pseudo-psychological beliefs and spills over into other unsubstantiated beliefs, such as paranormal and conspiracy beliefs. In Study 1, 88 students watched a mental-magic performance, after which we debunked the misunderstandings about psychology and exposed the trick. The results showed a decrease in pseudo-psychological beliefs and spillover into other unsubstantiated beliefs. In Study 2, 432 crowd workers participated in an online experiment with three conditions: trick exposure, no-trick exposure, and no-performance. Under all three conditions, the misunderstandings about psychology were explained. The decreasing trend emerged for all beliefs regardless of manipulation and persisted at the four-week follow-up for all beliefs except for conspiracy beliefs. The trend was particularly pronounced for pseudo-psychology beliefs in the trick exposure condition. The study’s contribution to effectively correcting misinformation is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozono et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: