Modeling indicates physical sputtering varies for lithium, boron, and silicon coatings, suggesting material choice impacts fusion performance.
Wall conditioning coatings—lithium(Li), boron(B) and silicon(Si) —introduced by lithiumization, boronization, or siliconization, serve as a critical strategy for suppressing fuel recycling and reducing impurity fluxes from the wall of a tokamak. These techniques directly improve plasma initiation, reproducibility, energy confinement and operational stability in fusion devices. However, these coatings undergo both physical and chemical sputtering by boundary plasma bombardment. This erosion behavior critically determines coating lifetime and, consequently, long-pulse plasma performance. To evaluate the impact of physical sputtering on coating durability and to compare material-specific differences, we employ binary collision approximation (BCA) simulations to investigate the physical sputtering behavior of Li, B, and Si coatings. Carbon (C) and tungsten (W) substrates are also modeled to assess interface effects. The results reveal pronounced differences in the sputtering yields of Li, B, and Si across incident angles and deuterium energies. Owing to its low surface binding energy, lithium exhibits the highest sputtering yield at large angles and low energies; whereas silicon, with the highest atomic number, presents the highest sputtering yield at small angles and high energies. Sputtering yields of carbon-based and tungsten-based coatings vary with angle and energy, driven by differences in deuterium backscattering at the interface and substrate sputtering. Notably, for tungsten-based coatings, the sputtering yields increase dramatically at specific energies. This arises because, due to tungsten’s high surface binding energy, incident deuterium atoms are reflected at the tungsten interface and subsequently collide with coating elements. Consequently, when the energy transferred to the surface element is higher than its sputtering threshold, the sputtering yield increases. Additionally, increasing incident fluence modifies the target composition, leading to corresponding changes in the sputtering yields of coating materials. In summary, coating materials should be selected according to the expected angle- and energy-distribution of the incident plasma particles. To suppress the abrupt yield increase observed of tungsten substrates at specific energies, the coatings must be sufficiently thick. These findings provide a theoretical basis for selecting conditioning materials and optimizing wall conditioning strategies in fusion devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: