Retrospective analysis reports high gamma pass rates in 1574 radiotherapy plans, indicating effective QA in patient treatment.
Objective: This study aims to retrospectively analyze and evaluate patient-specific quality assurance (QA) data from radiotherapy plans using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques at Akdeniz University Department of Radiation Oncology between 2017 and 2023. Methods: QA data from 1574 treatment plans for 1078 patients were reviewed. Treatment plans were generated using PRECISE TPS for static IMRT and MONACO TPS for dynamic IMRT/VMAT techniques. Gamma index analysis was performed using MatriXX with a 3%/3 mm acceptance criterion. Data was categorized based on disease location, treatment devices, and planning systems, then statistically analyzed using Google Sheets and Looker Studio. Results: Throughout this survey, no QA data was available for the year 2021 due to equipment upgrades. The anatomical distribution of plans was head-neck (496), pelvis (492), thoracic (542), abdomen (31), vertebra (10), femur (2). Most frequently applied techniques included 9-field IMRT (31.9%), dual-arc VMAT (23.3%), and single-arc VMAT (19.4%). Mean ± SD Gamma pass rates were 97.29% ± 1.60 for IMRT (356 plans) and 99.13% ± 1.10 for VMAT (1012 plans). Conclusion: Both treatment planning systems (TPSs) yielded high gamma pass rates, indicating a high level of treatment delivery accuracy and reliability. VMAT usage increased over time due to its compatibility with equipment and precise dose delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şahin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: