Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a short magnetic resonance (MR) protocol for knee evaluation, using 3D PDW SPAIR sequences compared with traditional 2D ones. Methods: A prospective analysis included 76 patients with knee pain. MR was performed using a 1.5 T scanner. The standard protocol consisted of multiplanar 2D proton density-weighted (PDW) SPectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery (SPAIR) and additional T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) sequences, with a total acquisition time of 17 min. The simulated short protocol included a 3D PDW SPAIR sequence with isotropic voxels and a slice thickness of 0.6 mm, coronal T1W, and gradient echo (GRE) axial sequences, with a total acquisition time of 9 min. Two radiologists independently reviewed images and collected pathological processes. Results: The 3D PDW SPAIR sequence demonstrated a significantly higher subjective image quality compared to standard 2D sequences [κ = 0.712 (p < 0.001) vs. κ = 0.144 (p = 0.63); p < 0.001]. Artifacts were not significantly different between the two protocols (p = 0.201). Qualitative assessments showed superior ratings for 3D images (excellent quality: 72.4% vs. 26.3% for 3D and 2D, respectively; p < 0.001). Diagnostic performance was comparable between the two protocols for ACL injuries, medial and lateral collateral ligament injuries, and chondropathies. Three-dimensional sequences were more effective in detecting medial meniscal injuries (p < 0.001), particularly radial and complex tears, likely due to higher spatial resolution and multiplanar reconstruction capability. Conclusions: The 3D PDW SPAIR sequence offers advantages in knee MRI study, including improved image quality, reduced acquisition time, and superior detection of meniscal injuries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinnizzotto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: