Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 17, 2025Uzhhorod National University Herald Series LawOpen Access

Determining competent jurisdiction in cross-border art disputes

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BKBogdan KryvolapovTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This article assesses jurisdiction over cultural assets, highlighting ADR's potential to improve legal outcomes.

Key Points

  • Effective legal mechanisms for restoring cultural property are urgently needed due to risks from illegal circulation.
  • Jurisdictional conflicts arise in cross-border cases, necessitating insights from EU judicial practice on cultural assets.
  • The application of the forum rei sitae rule can streamline legal proceedings in disputes involving cultural objects.
  • Arbitration may offer a more efficient method for resolving disputes over cultural property, as indicated by case studies.

Cite This Study

Bogdan Kryvolapov (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36ddf0a429f797333110ehttps://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.89.1.49
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cultural Property Protection in Private International Law2024
  2. 2Beyond Ownership: An Evolving Framework for the Restitution of Cultural Objects2026
  3. 3Civil Forfeiture and Transnational Cultural Property Returns in the United States2026
  4. 4Legal Consequences of Economic and Financial Damage Caused to Cultural Heritage: The Case of Armed Aggression against Ukraine2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Art Collections and Private International Law – The Case of the Esterházy Treasures2025