Mixed-methods research identifies themes in public understanding and validates a new survey scale on scientific uncertainty.
Scientific uncertainty has long posed challenges for science communication and research. There is a need to better understand how non-expert publics conceptualize scientific uncertainty and how to reliably and validly measure public understanding of scientific uncertainty. We address this need using a mixed-methods approach. In Study 1 we conducted a series of focus groups to explore how non-expert publics conceptualize scientific uncertainty and identified three themes related to process, contexts, and impacts. In Study 2 we developed and validated a new 9-item survey scale to measure public understanding of scientific uncertainty (PUSU).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beets et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: