Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This juristic study explores murabahah financing in the context of the Sri Lankan Muslim minority, highlighting maqasid al-shariah implications.
This research paper explores the Murabahah product offered by Al-Noor Islamic window at the Bank of Ceylon in Sri Lanka. The phenomenon of Islamic windows within conventional banks, which is rooted in interest-based (usurious) systems, presents a new challenge to contemporary Islamic banking frameworks. However, the Islamic window faces several challenges, particularly because it operates within a traditional, usurious banking structure. These issues need to be carefully examined and addressed, with a focus on the jurisprudential concerns that arise, which require solutions that align with the context of the Sri Lankan Muslim minority. This is because the capital acquired to establish the Islamic window and the scope of autonomy of its activities and banking products, such as Murābaḥah, necessitate jurisprudential adaptation from the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. From this standpoint, this study examines the application of Murābaḥah financing at Al-Noor Islamic Window of the Bank of Ceylon, considering it as one of its products in light of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. This study employs an inductive approach to gather and review relevant materials, along with an analytical and comparative approach for explanation, conclusions, and discussions. The findings suggest that, while the Murābaḥah product in Al-Noor window operates with some degree of independence, it still requires further development and should be evaluated in the context of banking windows in other countries. This would help to ensure the alignment of jurisprudential solutions with local contexts. Likewise, raising the awareness of Islamic banking is essential for promoting the national economy, safeguarding and developing financial assets, and thus changing the narrow perceptions of the non-Muslim majority toward Islamic finance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kareem et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: