Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis shows differing results between KRLS and probit in capturing non-linearities in international trade models.
Firm characteristics in empirical models for margins of international trade usually enter these models in linear form. If non-linearities do matter and are ignored this leads to biased results. Researchers, however, can never be sure that all possible non-linear relationships are taken care of. A solution is provided by Kernel Regularized Least Squares (KRLS) that uses a machine learning approach to learn the functional form from the data. While in earlier applications the big picture revealed by standard empirical models and KRLS was identical this note presents a case where results from a standard approach and KRLS do differ considerably.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joachim Wagner (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: