Genome-wide association analysis reveals significant genetic variants linked to RSV hospitalization risk in Taiwanese children, suggesting the need for targeted vaccination strategies.
Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections in young children worldwide. While several risk factors for severe RSV illness are known, the role of host genetic susceptibility remains underexplored, particularly in East Asian populations. Objective: This preliminary study aimed to identify genetic variants associated with RSV-related hospitalization in the Taiwanese pediatric population using a genome-wide association approach. Methods A total of 260 children aged ≥6 months were recruited from Mackay Memorial Hospital and the corresponding author's social media page between November 2020 and March 2022. Genotyping was performed using the Axiom Genome-Wide TPM 2.0 array, followed by imputation and quality control. Genome-wide association analyses were conducted under additive, dominant, and recessive models, adjusting for population stratification. Results Eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were significantly associated with RSV hospitalization risk (rs183825, rs141541148, rs7296788, rs16862251, rs1525107, rs2105758, rs622946, and rs12857032). Notably, rs141541148 (OR = 9.14) and rs1361088 (OR = 8.58 in boys) were associated with substantially increased risk. Conversely, rs16862251 was linked to a reduced risk (OR = 0.19), suggesting a protective role possibly mediated through T-cell receptor signaling. Conclusion Our findings identify several gene loci associated with higher rates of hospital admissions due to RSV in children of ≥6 months of age. By studying the genetic variations that may predispose people to RSV infection, it may be possible to gain a better understanding of risk factors and prioritize vaccination for specific populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: