This analysis explores architecture's role in addressing fragmentation in peri-urban areas, highlighting design strategies and case studies.
Peri-urban areas constitute their own spatial system; a new rhizomatic city that brings together a heterogeneous mosaic of identities, uses and relationships. These ecologically and programmatically rich contexts are fluid, dynamic and ambiguous. As a result, urban planning has not generally produced satisfactory solutions for structuring these environments. In the absence of a coherent spatial strategy and institutional framework capable of re-composing peri-urban areas, architecture emerges as a tool capable of responding to the fluid and mutating character of these apparently chaotic landscapes. This paper analyses how contemporary architecture can enhance the coherence of peri-urban areas at a territorial scale through specific interventions. By exploring five case studies, it takes the architectural project as a working tool and explores some design strategies that can be effective in peri-urban contexts. The case studies share several characteristics that enable them to have a transformative impact on peri-urban areas. First, they function across the multiple scales of the peri-urban landscape. Second, they demonstrate a capacity to redress fragmentation and address diversity. Third, they signify the peri-urban landscape by constructing a new centrality on a territorial scale. Fourth, they assume the mutant condition of peri-urban environments through supports that offer programmatic indeterminacy. Five, they operate as infrastructural artifacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collantes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: