This study demonstrates D-cycloserine's anti-melanogenic effects in melanoma cells, suggesting its therapeutic potential for skin disorders.
Melanin overproduction contributes to hyperpigmentation disorders such as melasma and solar lentigines, leading to increasing demand for safe and effective skin-lightening agents. D-cycloserine (DCS), a known antimicrobial agent, has not been previously evaluated for dermatological applications. This study aimed to explore the potential of DCS as a novel anti-melanogenic compound and to elucidate its underlying molecular mechanisms in melanogenesis inhibition. The cytotoxicity and anti-melanogenic effects of DCS were assessed in B16F10 melanoma cells stimulated with α-MSH. Cell viability was determined via MTT assays, while melanin content, tyrosinase activity, and the expression levels of MITF, TYR, TRP-1, TRP-2, and major signaling proteins (e.g., CREB, MAPKs, GSK-3β/β-catenin) were evaluated using colorimetric assays and Western blotting. A 3D human skin model was also used to confirm in vitro findings, and a primary skin irritation test was conducted to assess dermal safety. DCS significantly reduced α-MSH-induced melanin content and tyrosinase activity without cytotoxicity at concentrations ≤100 µM. It downregulated MITF and melanogenic enzyme expression and modulated signaling pathways by enhancing ERK activation while inhibiting CREB, JNK, and p38 phosphorylation. Additionally, DCS suppressed β-catenin stabilization via GSK-3β activation. These effects were confirmed in a 3D human skin model, and a clinical skin irritation study revealed no adverse reactions in human volunteers. DCS exerts its anti-melanogenic effect by targeting multiple pathways, including CREB/MITF, MAPK, and GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Its efficacy and safety profiles support its potential as a novel cosmeceutical agent for the treatment of hyperpigmentation. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm its therapeutic utility in human skin pigmentation disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: