Unified model reduces costs in emergency response planning for hazardous chemical sites, highlighting safety and efficiency benefits.
The rapid clustering of Chemical Industrial Parks (CIPs) has escalated the risk of cascading disasters (e.g., toxic leaks and explosions), underscoring the need for resilient emergency logistics systems. However, traditional two-stage optimization models often yield suboptimal outcomes due to decoupled facility location and routing decisions. To address this issue, we propose a unified mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) model that integrates site selection and routing decisions in a single framework. The model accounts for multi-source supply allocation, enforces minimum safety distance constraints, and incorporates heterogeneous economic factors (e.g., regional land costs) to ensure risk-aware, cost-efficient planning. Two deployment scenarios are considered: (1) incremental augmentation of an existing emergency network and (2) full network reconstruction after a systemic failure. Simulations on a regional CIP cluster (2400 × 2400 km) were conducted to validate the model. The integrated approach reduced facility and operational costs by 9.77% (USD 13.68 million saved) in the incremental scenario and achieved a 15.10% (USD 21.13 million saved) total cost reduction over decoupled planning in the reconstruction scenario while maintaining an 8 km minimum safety distance. This integrated approach can enhance cost-effectiveness and strengthen the resilience of high-risk industrial emergency response networks. Overall, the proposed modeling framework, which integrates spatial constraints, time-sensitive supply mechanisms, and disruption risk considerations, is not only tailored for hazardous chemical zones but also exhibits strong potential for adaptation to a variety of high-risk scenarios, such as natural disasters, industrial accidents, or critical infrastructure failures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: