Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study examines self-presentation differences in primary and secondary Instagram accounts among Gen Z, highlighting impression management strategies.
This study examines the construction of personal branding on Instagram among Gen Z by comparing self-presentation on primary and secondary accounts. Using Erving Goffman's (1959) dramaturgy theory as the main framework, this study highlights how Gen Z conducts impression management through digital media, where Instagram functions as a "stage" where they present various versions of themselves. Core concepts used include impression management, front-stage–back-stage dynamics, and self-disclosure. This study does not establish formal hypotheses, but tentatively expects differences in self-presentation strategies between the two types of accounts. The method used is a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with selected informants using a purposive sampling technique based on certain criteria: Gen Z individuals aged 18–22 who actively use both types of Instagram accounts. The main focus of this study was to observe patterns of self-expression and image management on each account. To ensure the validity of the data, source triangulation techniques were used. The results show that primary accounts are used as a front stage to display a curated and socially accepted self-image, such as achievements or aesthetic content. In contrast, the second account serves as a more authentic, expressive, and emotional backstage, aimed at a closer social circle. This finding supports Goffman's theory and aligns with previous research. In conclusion, Instagram allows Gen Z to strategically construct and display multiple identities. This study contributes to communication studies by demonstrating the role of social media in shaping personal branding in the digital age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruslan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: