Comment indicates that circuit courts' rulings on ADA testers' standing are crucial for civil rights protection.
On February 15, 2023, in Laufer v. Naranda Hotels, LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a public accommodations tester possessed Article III standing to bring a claim against a hotel for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In doing so, the Fourth Circuit equalized the sides of a growing conflict among circuit courts concerning the proper approach to ADA testers’ ability to satisfy the constitutional requirements for standing. This Comment argues that the conclusions of the First, Fourth, and Eleventh Circuits recognizing that an ADA tester plaintiff has standing are correct and most effective in protecting the legislative purpose of the ADA and other civil rights laws. Further, this Comment argues that the approaches taken by the First, Fourth, and Eleventh Circuits offer two distinct pathways that demonstrate how an adherence to precedent supports a finding that an ADA tester plaintiff has standing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauren Pezzi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: