Clinical study reveals NiTi wires reduce discomfort and deformation, while SS wires have higher frictional resistance.
A BSTRACT Background: Orthodontic archwires’ characteristics are known to have an effect on the effectiveness, duration, and comfort of orthodontic treatment. Despite the widespread use of nickel-titanium (NiTi), SS, and TMA wires, comparative testing on wear, breakage, friction, and discomfort among patients has not been conducted. The study is still in its early stages. Aim: To check pain and deformation of patients and also for frictional resistance on various arches at the end of 6 weeks. Methodology: Across three groups (NiTi, SS, TMA), 25 patients were included in the study that evaluated the archwire deformation and frictional resistance. A sense of distress occurred at 24 h, 3 days, and 1 week. The statistical methods used were Chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Kaplan–Meier tests. Results: NiTi wires had the lowest level of deformation and breakage ( P = 0.038). In contrast, SS wires had the greatest frictional resistance ( P 0.001) among all other types. Time exhibited a gradual decrease in pain. Conclusion: The results indicate that a greater number of NiTi wires are more comfortable and durable, whereas SS wire has fewer breaks and friction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radhika Nair (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: