This analysis compares corporate sustainability methodologies on their social dimension, indicating insights for ESG practices.
This study investigates and compares corporate sustainability methodologies and initiatives with respect to their social dimension, examining their connection to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices while using the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE B3) of the Brazilian stock exchange (B3) as a benchmark. A systematic content analysis approach was employed, guided by three practical stages: (1) rigorous selection of materials for study, (2) coding and categorization of these materials, and (3) interpretation of the results. The analysis revealed that while some methodologies—such as the FTSE4Good, Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), and MSCI ESG Ratings—address social aspects similar to the ISE B3, none match the comprehensiveness of social criteria covered by the reference index. However, certain themes identified in other methodologies could be incorporated to enhance the scope of social issues assessed, thereby improving their utility as parameters for selecting socially responsible companies. This work contributes to the study of sustainability methodologies with a focus on social aspects and advances discussions on the social pillar of ESG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: