Impact load test reveals stiffness and damping coefficients in gas-lubricated bearings, suggesting enhanced rotor support.
Gas film bearings support high-speed mictroturbomachinery with increased efficiency and reliability, coupled with longer maintenance cycles and a reduction in environmental contaminants compared to conventional mineral oil-lubricated bearings. Externally pressurized porous carbon gas-lubricated bearings provide rotor support during static or startup conditions and have high lubricity and resilience in the case of a contact event at operating speeds. This paper presents a combination of static, impact, and imbalance loading experiments to characterize the static and dynamic performance of externally pressurized porous carbon gas radial bearings supporting a test rotor across a range of operating speeds and air supply pressures. The resulting stiffness and damping data was compared against a bearing finite element predictive tool. The static load test identified the system’s stiffness at 0 Hz by applying linear and cubic curve fits to the resulting force-displacement curves. Both schemes yielded stiffness estimates between 2–5 MN/m with correlation values greater than 90%. Bearing static stiffness estimates are in good agreement with the results of impact and imbalance load tests. The impact load test identified frequency-dependent direct stiffness and damping coefficients up to 200 Hz with a stationary rotor. Linearly independent forces were applied directly to the rotor with a calibrated impact hammer in X and Y directions at both ends of the rotor. Matching to the imbalance test data yielded estimates of speed-dependent direct stiffness and damping coefficients, which were validated using a commercial rotordynamic software. Speed-dependent force coefficients are in good agreement to those estimated using the static loading and impact loading parameter identification techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dudlo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: