Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis uncovers the complexities of human relations in postmodernism, indicating a decentralized subjectivity and diverse frameworks.
This article is inspired by the reflections of the Hungarian philosopher Ágnes Heller (representative of the so-called Budapest School), especially in two of her works: “Políticas de la postmodernidad” (1989), co-authored with Ferenc Féher, and “The Daily Life and History”, originally written in 1970. We are not interested here in his debt to Marxist thought, from which his work, a disciple that he was of George Lukács, originates, but rather the circumstances of complex human relations as a dialectic between life and everyday life. It is concluded that the heterogeneous aspect of which Heller speaks to us, without any universal hierarchy (in her words), is an affirmation (without labeling or absolutisms) of the postmodern theories of “decentralization of the subject” (Hall), “weak thinking” (Vattimo) or “elective affinities” (Maffesoli), among other theorists of this hermeneutic-phenomenological approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barros et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: