Survey research examines students' views on the role of ICT in teaching and learning outcomes, highlighting a shift from traditional methods.
The study assessed the perception of undergraduate students of Federal University of Kashere, Gombe State, Nigeria, on the use of Information and Communication Technology in determining teaching and learning outcome in the university. Universities in Nigeria have been reluctant in actively embracing and implementing the global mandate for integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into our classrooms. The prevailing culture of resisting change and adhering staunchly to traditional teaching methods, which have shown limited effectiveness, has hindered both our educators and students from competing on a global scale. The main objective of the study is to measure student perception and the extent of information and communication technology usage in enhancing teaching and learning outcomes in Federal University of Kashere, Gombe State. Survey research method was adopted, one research question guided the study and 300 copies of Four Likert Scale Questionnaire was evenly distributed across 6 faculties of the university. Simple percentages, frequency tables, standard deviation and mean were used to analyze the data obtained. The finding revealed notably, a substantial portion of the respondents expressed a positive disposition towards ICT gadgets and resources, suggesting receptiveness to technology. Additionally, a majority has experienced Computer-Based Test (CBT) examinations and exhibited a preference for CBT over traditional paper-and-pen tests, indicative of an inclination towards digital assessment methods. Due to the mixed landscape of perceptions and experiences the research recommends for a balanced and comprehensive approach to the integration of ICT in the academic environment to cater for the diverse preferences and needs of the students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathaniel Monday (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: