This analysis examines Frankenstein's critique of ability and social marginalization in the context of disability studies, suggesting deeper ethical questions.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) has long been read as a cautionary tale of scientific overreach, moral responsibility, and the gothic sublime. However, within the framework of disability studies, the novel acquires a different resonance. It emerges as a foundational text that interrogates the construction of monstrosity, the social marginalization of non-normative bodies, and the ethical limits of human experimentation. This article explores Frankenstein as a literary case study that challenges dominant narratives around ability, normalcy, and personhood. Through a critical re-examination of the Creature’s embodied experience and Victor Frankenstein’s scientific ambition, the novel can be understood as a proto-critical disability narrative that questions the very grounds on which the human is defined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Debalina Roychowdhury Banerjee (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: