Retrospective analysis compared tumor measurements in hepatic metastases across three imaging phases, suggesting VNC's potential equivalency to NCP.
To assess hepatic metastases between traditional non-contrast phase (NCP), portal venous phase (PVP), and virtual non-contrast phase (VNC) reconstructed from Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) performed in subjects with breast cancer. Methods: Hepatic metastatic lesions from breast cancer in consecutive, pre and post-contrast DECT examinations were retrospectively assessed by 2 experienced readers. Lesions were measured in single longest dimension (SLD) for each phase (NCP, PVP, VNC) and the mean difference was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test. One reader also assessed contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of the lesions compared to the liver for each phase with difference also assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: 87 hepatic metastatic lesions were assessed in 23 eligible subjects. SLD was greater for NCP (mean 2.14 cm) compared to PVP (mean 1.94 cm)(p<.001). The difference between VNC and PVP was also significant (2.09 cm vs. 1.94 cm)(p<.001), however, the difference between NCP and VNC was not significant (p=.25). Mean lesion CNR was 3.19 on PVP, 2.65 on VNC, and 1.21 for NCP, all of which were significantly different. Conclusions: VNC may be an adequate substitute to NCP in accurately assessing and measuring hepatic metastases from breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hardie et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: