The Effectiveness of Innovative Teaching and Learning Process in Outdoor Coaching.

This study was mainly venture into effectiveness of innovative coaching methods in the process of teaching and learning (T & L) Outdoor coaching course. Total of 22 males and 8 female students involved voluntarily. Varies technique skills such as – Circuit method; Part- part – Whole and Whole – Part Whole methods were performed in duration of 14 weeks. The respondents were undergone T & L process on these varies techniques hands – on practice for 3 hourly per session and per week. The final result showed descriptively all respondents were satisfied with the methods used by course’s instructor with mean score above mean score 4 out of 5 Likert scale for every single techniques skill and overall satisfaction level of respondents toward these methods showed statistically: General satisfaction, benefit gained, practical approaches, treatment to students, skills acquisitions, think and learn, personal skill, teamwork and effectiveness of instruction with mean score of 3.95.,4.08., 4.09., 4.13., 4.2., 4.07., 4.1., 3.94., & 4.1 respectively. Perhaps, the effectiveness of T & L which was used by the course’s instructor with highly mean score of 4.1 which concluded all respondents satisfied with methods. Thus, the hypothesis 4 rejected the null wherelse,H1, H2, H3, H5 and H6 showed results of no significant differences mean score in differences and correlation between 9 dimensions with respondents’ satisfaction liked: 198., .496., .310., .201., .833., 1.027., .398., .955.,1.011., & .242 as well as .015., .152., .002., 3.163., .528.,.040., .115., .847., .321., & .781 with significance level larger than .05 and thus, r = .184., .096.,.110.,.018, ,010., .166., .050., .134 & .031 and r = .107., .824,.064., 155., .050., .159 & .0126 larger than 0.05 level (Failed to reject Ho) respectively. In addition, this study showed high reliability of dimensions but respondents were not showed appreciative when summative results concerned. Therefore, this study resulted justified even though the innovative T & L method was relevance and appropriate for outdoor coaching course and this fulfilment of the outcome – based education (OBE) perspective but did not support the hypotheses set in this study at all. Moreover, this study did not vital for generalization purposes.