The study examined availability and accessibility of digital information services and library resources in agricultural research institute libraries in South-South, Nigeria. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design. Three research questions and three null hypotheses guided the study. The population of the study was 206 which comprised all the 133 researchers from Nigeria Institute for Oil Palm Research (NIFOR) and 73 Rubber Research Institute of Nigeria (RRIN). There was no sampling since population was manageable. The instrument for data collection was structured questionnaire validated by three experts, the reliability of the instrument was established using Cronbach’s Alpha statistic which yielded 0.85 as overall reliability coefficient. The data collected were analysed using mean and standard deviation to answer the research questions while the null hypotheses were tested using t-test statistics at 0.05 level of significance. Results showed that the types of digital information services available in research institutes libraries in South-South, Nigeria include e-journals, electronic databases - TEEAL (The Essential Electronic Agricultural Library), AGORA (Global Online Research in Agriculture), HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) etc. - and bibliographic services only while others were unavailable. It was also found that researchers in the two research institutes accessed digital information services respectively to low extent. Finally, it was found that the purposes for which researchers access digital information services include for conducting research, updating knowledge, to chat with friends, for leisure and recreational services and for e-mail services among others. From the findings, it was recommended that agricultural research institutes should organize regular trainings for researchers and librarians on effective accessibility and use of digital information services for research and other related purposes.
Bosah et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: