Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical literature review reveals religion's dual role in supporting and constraining migrant care work mobility.
The globalization of care work constitutes a major equality issue in contemporary societies. Although the relevance of religion and morality in constructing/organizing migrant care work (MCW) is acknowledged, their role remains under-theorized, and the debate has mainly centered on secular actors/processes. Yet organized religions carry specific gender/ethnic projects and are concerned with regulating social reproduction. Based on a critical literature review spanning different historical periods, contexts, and faiths, we develop a conceptual framework serving a multi-scalar analysis of the role of religion in MCW. We focus on the interconnections between macro-level transnational religious networks promoting care mobilities, meso-level religion regimes shaping MCWs’ inclusion into national labor markets, and micro-level work practices. The concept of “moralized care mobilities” captures the multi-level and ambivalent role of religion(s) in upholding traditional gender regimes and in enabling and constraining pathways to MCW mobility, providing resources for empowerment but also sanctifying social inequalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: