Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis improves solar wind estimates at 0.1 AU and enhances understanding of CMEs, indicating better predictive capabilities.
Reconstruction of inner-heliosphere conditions is typically a three-step process. 1, the photospheric magnetic field is used to constrain a coronal model, which provides an estimate of the steady-state solar-wind at 0.1 AU; 2, coronagraph observations of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are used to characterise transient solar-wind disturbances at 0.1 AU; 3, a solar wind model propagates these structures out to Earth. A major limitation of this process is the accuracy of the ambient solar-wind estimate at 0.1 AU, which introduces significant uncertainty into reconstruction of the inner-heliosphere solar wind. Here, we demonstrate how an accurate estimate of the ambient solar wind at 0.1 AU can instead be produced from in-situ solar wind observations out at 1 AU. Using the fast CMEs (~1,500 km/s) in May 2024 as an example, we show that this process can accurately reproduce the solar-wind conditions at Earth and at Solar Orbiter, which was on the far side of the Sun. Solar-wind speed errors are reduced by more than 50% for this interval, though we stress that this is a reconstruction that has access to observations that would not be available to a genuine forecast. However, it is hoped that more accurate reconstructions of the ambient solar wind will lead to a better understanding of the properties of CMEs near the Sun and their subsequent propagation to Earth and other solar-system bodies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Owens et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: