Retrospective cohort study reveals faster recovery with minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus patients in Al-Ahsa, suggesting it may enhance surgical choices.
Background: Patients with hallux valgus with hammer toes have limited mobility and quality of life. In Saudi Arabia, 21% of individuals have hallux valgus, which often requires surgery. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is becoming more popular because of its reduced post-operative discomfort, quicker recovery and superior cosmetic results. Despite its expanding popularity, MIS is underreported locally for foot abnormality patients, underlining the need for regional statistics to aid surgical decision-making. There is little research on this in Saudi Arabia, especially Al-Ahsa. Methods: From January 2017 to December 2021, three Al-Ahsa tertiary care facilities performed MIS or open surgery on 18-year-olds with hallux valgus or hammer toes. We gathered demographics, comorbidities, perioperative data, complications and outcomes including surgical time, hospitalisation length, infection and complication rate, weight-bearing time and pain scores. Results: A total of 210 patients were retrospectively evaluated (105 MIS; 105 open surgery). Groups were similar in age ( P > 0.05). The average hospital stay for MIS and open surgery patients was 2.1 ± 1.0 and 3.4 ± 1.2 days, respectively ( P < 0.001). The MIS group recovered faster (median: 2 weeks vs. 4 weeks; P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in infection rates between groups (P = 0.33), the MIS group experienced fewer wound problems ( P < 0.05). Malalignment and recurrence rates were comparable between groups at 12 months ( P = 0.81). Conclusion: MIS provides faster recovery and shorter hospitalisation without increasing post-operative complications. It is an effective treatment option for forefoot deformities. Prospective multicentre studies are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alqahtani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: