PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 21, 2025Frontiers in Veterinary Science13 citationsOpen Access

Methods for assessing efficacy of cleaning and disinfection in livestock farms: a narrative review

View Full Paper
IMI. F. MakovskaEBEvelien BiebautPDPankaj Dhaka

Key Points

  • Cleaning and disinfection methods are essential for maintaining biosecurity on livestock farms, and their effectiveness can vary widely.
  • Key methods include ATP bioluminescence for quantitative data, though factors like detergents can influence results significantly.
  • Microbiological tests provide accurate assessments of disinfection efficacy, yet they are often labor-intensive and resource-demanding.
  • Recommendations include a tailored approach incorporating multiple evaluation methods for optimal hygiene management in farms.

Abstract

Cleaning and disinfection (CD) procedures are essential components of farm biosecurity, aiming to reduce microbial load and eliminate the pathogenic microorganisms in livestock farms facilities. This review examines the various methods used to assess the effectiveness of both cleaning and disinfection, exploring their strengths, limitations, and optimal-use scenarios. For cleaning evaluation, common methods include basic visual inspections, ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence, rapid protein tests (RPT), redox potential, and microbiological swabbing. However, visual inspections and UV fluorescence alone provide only qualitative insights. ATP offers quantitative data, though the accuracy can be influenced by the presence of detergents or disinfectants, requiring careful calibration. Additionally, ATP and RPT testing demands standardization to ensure consistent results. A new promising redox method is fast and more accurate, however still has limited field applicability. Microbiological methods, while highly accurate in detecting microbial contamination, are resource-intensive and therefore not in frequent use for routine evaluation of the cleaning procedures. For assessment of disinfection procedures microbiological tests such as colony-forming unit counts on agar plates, as well as the use of selective media for target microbes or hygiene indicator organisms are more appropriate than non-microbiological tests as they offer direct evidence of microbial elimination. However, these methods can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. Molecular methods can be powerful tools in detecting hard-to-culture organisms, however, are more expensive and require specialized equipment. Given these challenges, our study recommends a comprehensive CD evaluation protocol, incorporating multiple methods tailored to the farm’s specific biosecurity needs and epidemiological context. This integrated approach improves the reliability and efficiency of CD monitoring, ensuring robust hygiene management in farm settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Makovska et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a6fb9e5502675167ba987ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1581217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1New Detection Systems of Bacteria Using Highly Selective Media Designed by SMART: Selective Medium-Design Algorithm Restricted by Two Constraints2011 · 42 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of Environmental Sampling for Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in the Pre-Weaned Calf Area and Calving Area of Infected Dairy Farms Enrolled in a Voluntary Johne’s Disease Control Programme2023 · 5 citations
  3. 3Biocontrol and Rapid Detection of Food-Borne Pathogens Using Bacteriophages and Endolysins2016 · 150 citations
  4. 4A sampling regime based on an ATP bioluminescence assay to assess the quality of poultry carcasses at critical control points during processing1997 · 25 citations
  5. 5Indicator Organisms for Safety and Quality—Uses and Methods for Detection: Minireview2003 · 150 citations