This review discusses advantages of different measurement methods for metacognition in psychology, highlighting self-reported questionnaires.
21st century skills, like self-regulation, metacognition, communication, collaboration, digital and critical thinking skills become increasingly relevant in every life domain. Metacognitive processes contribute to the adequate planning and execution of activities, time-management, adaptive emotion regulation. In this review several online and offline measurement methods are demonstrated, highlighting the advantages, strengths and disadvantages, weaknesses of the most often used instruments for the assessment of metacognition, namely of the self-reported questionnaires. One of the most frequently applied offline self-reported instruments for the study of metacognition is the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory developed by Schraw and Dennison in 1994. The inventory measures five metacognitive regulation skill: planning, information management strategies, comprehension monitoring, debugging strategies, evaluation and three types of metacognitive knowledge: declarative, procedural and conditional knowledge. However, the results regarding the factorial structure, subcomponents and item structure of the inventory are very contradictory. Some possible explanations of these contradictory results are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: