What question did this study set out to answer?

June 1, 2002Journal of Educational Psychology

Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

KMKouider MokhtariThe University of Texas at Tyler CRCarla A. ReichardThe University of Texas at Tyler

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Psychometric validation study demonstrates structural reliability in adolescent and adult readers, highlighting useful metrics for academic comprehension assessment.

Key Points

To develop and evaluate the psychometric validity and reliability of the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) for measuring adolescent and adult readers' strategy use.
Constructed and administered a self-report questionnaire assessing strategy use across academic and school-related texts in adolescent and adult student cohorts.
Conducted psychometric analyses to determine the instrument's internal reliability and factorial validity.
Factor analysis identified three distinct strategy subscales: Global Reading Strategies, Problem-Solving Strategies, and Support Reading Strategies.
The instrument demonstrated strong factorial validity and internal reliability across the subscales for academic reading assessment.

Cite This Study

Mokhtari et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10dc0ecfa01e990d9faeb5 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Psychometric validation study demonstrates structural reliability in adolescent and adult readers, highlighting useful metrics for academic comprehension assessment.

Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies.

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies.

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider