Metascience won't solve the replication crisis: Replications across the pyramid of culture change

In this sequence of presentations, we discuss why replications - despite their high relevance - are rarely conducted and published and provide solutions that are structured around the COS's pyramid of culture change: * Replications are often not possible due to deficiencies in reporting standards and data availability. * There is no consensus on standards of replicability, leaving the door open for successful and failed replications to be dismissed as irrelevant. * There is still a lack of interest in robust research by commercial journals and funders due to an overreliance on bibliometrics in research assessment. * In sum, replication research is not rewarding unless it is based on simple studies (e.g., online surveys), reported in batches of hundreds of findings, and yields far reaching results about the replicability of research from entire fields or journals. Many metascientific studies rely on replication attempts with questionable generalizability. To support researchers in conducting replication research in a sustainable way and to provide a solid basis for meta-science on replicability in the long run, we present multiple projects from the FORRT Replication Hub that solve these problems: * Open educational resources enable future replications. * An interdisciplinary and collaborative guide to replications and reproductions will facilitate the execution of replications. * Replication rankings and journal databases allow researchers to choose journals based on robustness and openness instead of misleading bibliometrics. * A diamond open access journal will reward the publication of replication research and allow for discussions about replication methods spanning multiple disciplines.