Qualitative analysis shows contrasting media framing of the TikTok ban in China and the U.S., indicating cultural and political influences.
Abstract This study explores the media framing of the TikTok ban in People's Daily Online (PDO) and CNN between 2020 and 2024. Using framing theory and qualitative framing analysis, the research examines how each outlet constructs meaning around the TikTok ban and presents related issues and solutions. The results show that despite the differences in media framing between the two countries, both are influenced to some extent by their respective political systems and social cultures. PDO blames the ban on bullying by the U.S., portraying it as unfair and politically motivated. PDO presents a solution that strongly condemns the ban and encourages global solidarity while emphasizing China's independence. In contrast, CNN has a more balanced perspective, incorporating a variety of viewpoints but focusing primarily on the actions of the U.S. government and public concerns about privacy and security.CNN recommends that the U.S. update its data security policies to prevent the rise of monopoly tech platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zilu Wang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: