Observational analysis improves predictability of climate variability using initial conditions in CESM2, suggesting a less smoothed trajectory.
Here, we present a new seasonal-to-multiyear Earth prediction system, CESM2-MP, based on the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). A 20-member ensemble that assimilates oceanic temperature and salinity anomalies provides the initial conditions for 5-year predictions from 1960 to 2020. We analyze skills using pairwise ensemble statistics, calculated among individual ensemble members (IM), and compare the results with those obtained from the more commonly used ensemble mean (EM) approach. This comparison is motivated by the fact that an EM of a nonlinear dynamical system generates, unlike reality, a heavily smoothed trajectory, akin to the evolution of a slow manifold. However, for most autonomous nonlinear systems, the EM does not even represent a solution of the underlying physical equations, and it should therefore not be used as an estimate of the expected trajectory. The IM-based approach is less sensitive to ensemble size than EM-based skill computations, and its estimates of attainable prediction skills are closer to the actual skills. Using IM-based statistics helps to unravel the physics of predicted patterns in the CESM2-MP and their relationship to ocean-atmosphere-land interactions and climate modes of variability. Furthermore, the IM-based method emphasizes predictability of the 1 st kind, which is associated with initial error sensitivity. In contrast, the EM-based method is more sensitive to the predictability of the 2 nd kind, which is associated with the external forcing and time-varying boundary conditions. Calculating IM-based skills for the CESM2-MP provides new insights into the sources of predictability originating from ocean initial conditions, helping to delineate and quantify the forecast limits of internal climate variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: