Study reveals degradation differences and immune responses in various ECM meshes, suggesting tailored scaffold designs.
Abstract BACKGROUND Absorbable extracellular matrix (ECM) meshes lack standardized evaluation frameworks for cross-species safety and efficacy. This study aimed to establish a comprehensive assessment system for clinical-grade ECM meshes. METHODS Three ECM meshes—human/pig dermis (HAD/PAD) and porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS)—were characterized for physicochemical properties and biocompatibility. In vitro degradation was tested via collagenase digestion. Immunogenic residues (α-gal antigen, DNA) were quantified. In vivo performance was evaluated in rabbit subcutaneous and rat abdominal wall defect models, analyzing degradation, immune response, macrophage polarization (CD206 + M2), and collagen deposition. RESULTS SIS showed rapid in vitro degradation (90.49 ± 0.42% mass loss by day 7, fourfold faster than PAD, p < 0.01). HAD induced minimal foreign body reactions (2.3-fold weaker than SIS at day 30, p = 0.017) and sustained M2 dominance (68.4% vs. 41.2% in SIS). Serum metabolomics revealed ECM-specific amino acid metabolic shifts. Rat models confirmed reduced inflammation and enhanced collagen remodeling with HAD/PAD vs. SIS. CONCLUSION This integrated evaluation framework identifies material-specific degradation-immune correlations, providing benchmarks for immunomodulatory ECM scaffold design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: