Analysis reveals how bottom reinforcement and concealed beam design affect joint performance and ductility.
The vertical load-bearing performance of slab–column joints is significantly affected by bottom reinforcement and concealed beams, but existing studies remain insufficient in analyzing their influence mechanisms. To address this, the effects of bottom reinforcement, concealed beam width, and punch-to-span ratio on the mechanical properties of joints are systematically investigated in this study through finite element analysis. Validating 2 experimental models and establishing 13 parametric models, the results shows that adding bottom reinforcement can enhance the late-stage bearing capacity and ductility of joints; increasing the ratio of top-to-bottom reinforcement improves bearing capacity but reduces ductility; a wider concealed beam leads to better bearing capacity and ductility performance of the joint; and under the same concealed beam width, a larger punching–span ratio reduces bearing capacity but improves ductility. This study reveals the critical role of bottom reinforcement and concealed beams in joint performance, providing a theoretical basis for optimizing design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: