Novel inter-frequency cross-validation reduces detection errors in GNSS, suggesting improved positioning accuracy.
Cycle slip detection in the carrier phase is important for achieving precise relative positioning with global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) in urban environments. The false alarm rate (FAR) and missing detection rate (MDR) of the detection approach will significantly affect the positioning error. This paper proposes a novel cycle slip detection approach based on inter-frequency cross-validation (IFCV), and designs corresponding test statistics and thresholds. In contrast to conventional cycle slip detection methods, the proposed IFCV approach has the advantages of higher accuracy and efficiency, which is validated by the airborne dynamic test. For cycle slips of specific proportions (such as five-cycle and four-cycle slips), the IFCV method significantly reduces the MDR from 3.89% to 0% and decreases the relative positioning error from 4.69 cm to 3.17 cm. In tests involving randomly injected cycle slips, the IFCV method reduces the MDR from 0.02% to 0%, reduces the relative positioning error from 3.83 cm to 3.02 cm, and decreases the average computational time from 1.02 ms to 0.53 ms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: