Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis evaluated PCR assay performance for aspergillosis diagnosis in patients, suggesting its viability as an adjunct test.
Introduction: Aspergillosis is a major threat for immunocompromised and critically ill patients. Early diagnosis and initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy are essential for favorable clinical outcome. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a PCR assay in serum, compared to conventional method, for the diagnosis of aspergillosis. Material and methods: Specimens of 125 patients divided into 4 groups, classified according to clinical diagnosis and EORTC/MSG criteria, were analysed at the Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Skopje, with conventional and molecular methods, during a period of two years (2014-2016). Results: Seventy-one isolates of Aspergillus were confirmed in BAL culture. Aspergillus was detected in 63.33% of patients with chronic aspergillosis, followed by 56.67% of cystic fibrosis patients, 51.43% of patients with primary immunodeficiency, and 43.33% of patients with prolonged stay in ICU. Sensitivity and specificity of BAL culture were: 64.29% and 100%, 59.09% and 100%, 54.55% and 12.5%, 100% and 54.17%, in the I, II, III and IV group, respectively. PCR performed in serum yielded the following results for sensitivity and specificity: 53.57% and 100% in group I, 36.36% and 100% in group II, 9.09% and 100% in group III, respectively. Serum PCR was not performed in the group with cystic fibrosis. Conclusion: Our results indicate that PCR in serum could be a useful adjunct test for diagnosis of aspergillosis, along with results from conventional mycological method, so a timely antifungal treatment with a favorable clinical outcome, is achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Гордана Мирчевска (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: