Retrospective analysis finds VATS decreases recurrence rate in primary spontaneous pneumothorax, suggesting cost-effectiveness benefits.
Abstract Background Optimal management for first-episode primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) with pulmonary blebs remains uncertain, balancing recurrence prevention against procedural costs. This study compared video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and chest tube drainage in terms of recurrence prevention and cost-effectiveness, incorporating sensitivity analyses to evaluate robustness across variable assumptions. Methods In a retrospective cohort (2010–2020), 245 first-episode PSP patients with computed tomography (CT)-confirmed blebs were included. Propensity score matching (1:1, caliper = 0.02) balanced baseline characteristics (age, bleb size, etc.), generating 33 matched pairs. Primary outcomes were recurrence rate and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results VATS reduced 5-year recurrence rates from 48.5–12.1% (P = 0.004; absolute risk reduction [ARR] = 36.4%, number needed to treat [NNT] = 2.75) and improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.166, P < 0.001). The base-case ICER was ¥160,300 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (¥48,937 per recurrence avoided), with 99.14% probability of cost-effectiveness at China’s World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (¥287,247 / QALY). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness: ICER remained favorable at ¥156,338 / QALY when pneumothorax utility dropped to 0.5; a 20% cost increase yielded ¥192,200 / QALY. Discount rate variations (3%: ¥159,800 / QALY; 6%: ¥138,029 / QALY) maintained > 98.4% cost-effectiveness probability. Conclusions VATS reduces recurrence by 83.4% in first-episode PSP with blebs and demonstrates robust cost-effectiveness. Early surgical intervention should be considered for patients with blebs across diverse resource settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiaowei Lin (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: