Review discusses efficacy of herbal supplements and essential oils in children, highlighting safety and regulation concerns.
Purpose of review The growing interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has sparked discussions about its role in modern pediatric healthcare. While some parents may turn to herbal supplements, essential oils, and other remedies for symptom management, questions remain regarding their safety, efficacy, and regulation for pediatric use. Pediatricians should understand the benefits and limitations of CAM to effectively inform families. Recent findings Recent studies suggest that certain CAM therapies may offer relief for pediatric conditions like anxiety and digestive disorders. However, a lack of research and standardized regulation raises concerns about their clinical value, appropriate dosing, and misinformation. While parental interest has led to integration of CAM into some mainstream settings, further studies are needed to establish better evidence-based guidelines for use in pediatric patients. Summary CAM continues to garner attention as families seek holistic alternatives to traditional healthcare. While CAM therapies may offer benefit when used alongside conventional medicine, they do not rival first-line treatments for pediatric disorders. Providers must be wary of unverified claims and risks. Incorporating evidence-based research and regulatory oversight can help maximize the well tolerated and effective use of CAM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lowance et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: