Mixed-methods research reveals how professional identity influences emotional decision-making in ethically ambiguous digital roles, highlighting key strategies.
This study examines how professionals in boundary-spanning digital roles construct and maintain coherent professional identities while navigating ethically ambiguous situations. Drawing on a mixed-methods study combining interviews (n=47), experience sampling (n=32), and vignette experiments (n=128) with AI ethics specialists, content moderators, and platform governance professionals, I identify three identity orientation strategies—anchoring, hybridizing, and pioneering—that significantly influence emotional regulation and ethical decision-making. Findings reveal that effective ethical navigation in "gray zones" depends on emotional sophistication: integrating emotional responses as valuable information within ethical deliberation. The proposed model of "ethical identity work" conceptualizes professional identity construction as an ongoing accomplishment requiring integration of professional self-concept, emotional intelligence, and contextual ethical reasoning. This research contributes theoretical insights at the intersection of professional identity, emotional regulation, and ethical decision-making while offering practical implications for organizations supporting professionals in emerging digital roles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Westover (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: