Quantitative study reveals psychological safety mediates inclusive leadership and employee voice in remote employees, highlighting key insights for management.
Remote and hybrid modes of work have become widespread since the Covid-19 pandemic and pose new challenges for organisations. This study examined the mediating role of psychological safety in the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee voice in a sample of remote and hybrid employees. While inclusive leadership involves openness, availability, and accessibility, we argue that it does not necessarily remove the risk involved for employees who want to raise well-intentioned concerns, and that psychological safety is necessary for this. A quantitative, cross-sectional, survey-based design was used with purposive sampling. White-collar employees ( N = 146) in South Africa completed online questionnaires during the Covid-19 pandemic. The statistical analyses identified significant relationships between all the variables as well as a mediating role for psychological safety in the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee voice. Recommendations are made for increasing well-intentioned employee voice in organisations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohase et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: