Prospective study explores how vitamin D levels and VDR expression influence COVID-19 outcomes in Lebanese patients, suggesting implications for immune response.
Background and objectives The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic underscored the importance of identifying host factors that influence susceptibility to infection. Vitamin D signaling, mediated via its receptor ( VDR ), along with innate immune mediators such as antimicrobial peptides (e.g., DEFA1-3 ) and inflammatory chemokines (e.g., CCL20 ), plays a critical role in antiviral defense. This study aimed to determine how serum vitamin D status and gene expression of VDR , DEFA1-3 , and CCL20 associate with COVID-19 risk in a Lebanese cohort. Methods This prospective observational study assessed serum vitamin D concentrations and nasopharyngeal gene expression in Lebanese participants tested for SARS-CoV-2 between January and March 2024. We enrolled 264 patients undergoing RT-qPCR (targeting ORF1 , N , and E genes) and quantified serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]. In a subset of 70 individuals stratified by COVID-19 status, we measured VDR , DEFA1-3 , CCL20 , and GAPDH expression by RT-qPCR. Multiple logistic regression and Pearson correlation analyses were performed. Results Serum vitamin D levels and CCL20 expression were not significantly associated with COVID-19 status. Elevated VDR expression in nasopharyngeal tissue correlated with lower COVID-19 risk (OR = 0.40, p = 0.05) and inversely with 25(OH)D levels (r = –0.61, p = 0.04). Higher DEFA1–3 expression reduced COVID-19 risk by 81.6% (OR = 0.184, p = 0.012). Among COVID-19 negatives, VDR correlated with CCL20 (r = 0.59, p < 0.01); among positives, VDR correlated with DEFA1-3 (r = 0.45, p < 0.05). Conclusion Our findings reveal a complex interplay between systemic vitamin D status, local VDR expression, and innate inflammatory mediators in COVID-19. They support a model in which both micronutrient levels and tissue-specific vitamin D signaling modulate host susceptibility and disease severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Missilmani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: