Quasi-experimental study improved critical thinking and report writing in EFL learners, suggesting effective teaching methods.
Critical thinking is a fundamental skill in academic writing, yet EFL instruction often focuses more on the final product than the cognitive process. This quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of the process-product approach in fostering critical thinking in academic report writing among EFL students. One hundred eleven sixth-semester English Education students at Saifuddin Zuhri State Islamic University were involved. Using cluster random sampling, two intact classes were selected: Class C (n = 40) as the experimental group and Class A (n = 40) as the control group. The experimental group received writing instruction based on the process-product approach, while the control group received conventional instruction. Critical thinking and report writing skills were assessed through pre- and post-tests, and the data were analyzed using paired-samples and independent-samples t-tests. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in critical thinking scores (pre-test M = 69.4, SD = 4.6; post-test M = 83.2, SD = 3.8), compared to the control group (pre-test M = 68.9, SD = 4.3; post-test M = 74.5, SD = 4.1), t(78) = 8.21, p < .001. Report writing scores also improved significantly in the experimental group (M = 85.0, SD = 3.7) versus the control group (M = 76.2, SD = 4.0), t(78) = 10.27, p < .001. The most notable gains were inference, evaluation, organization, and argument clarity. These findings support using the process-product approach to enhance critical thinking and writing skills in EFL academic contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benny Krisbiantoro (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: