Systematic review compares tegoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for Helicobacter pylori eradication, highlighting safety differences.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan (TPZ) compared to conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for Helicobacter pylori eradication as first- and second-line therapies. Four databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies comparing TPZ- and PPI-based regimens for H. pylori eradication published until October 15, 2024. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) based on intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. The PROSPERO registration number of the study is CRD42024622705. Nine studies (three RCTs and six retrospective studies) involving 5228 treatment-naïve patients were included. TPZ was non-inferior to PPIs as a first-line therapy (intention-to-treat: odds ratio [OR] 1.066, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.929-1.224; per-protocol: OR 1.142, 95% CI: 0.967-1.349). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences based on study design, therapeutic regimen, or treatment duration. In patients with clarithromycin-resistant strains confirmed by 23S rRNA sequencing, TPZ achieved a higher eradication rate (OR 4.961, 95% CI 1.024-24.030). TPZ was associated with significantly lower odds of abdominal discomfort compared to PPIs (OR 0.490, 95% CI 0.268-0.897). Regarding treatment duration, a 14-day regimen was linked to a lower risk of diarrhea, while a 7-day regimen was associated with a higher risk of abdominal pain. No significant differences were observed in second-line therapeutic outcomes. TPZ represents a non-inferior alternative to PPIs for H. pylori eradication, with potential benefits in clarithromycin-resistant infections and favorable safety profiles. Future studies are warranted to assess higher dosages and address pharmacokinetic limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Purja et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: