Objective analysis ranks hydrological vulnerability in urban areas, suggesting improved flood mitigation strategies.
Hydrologically vulnerable areas should be identified for sustainable urban watershed management, flood mitigation, and climate-resilient infrastructure planning. However, assessing hydrological vulnerability in complex urban environments requires a comprehensive framework that integrates hydrological components and considers spatial heterogeneity. Thus, this study proposes an objective, data-driven method for identifying hydrologically vulnerable areas in urban regions using multicriteria decision-making (MCDM). The MCDM technique is used to rank the hydrological health of subwatersheds in an urbanizing watershed. Entropy-based weights are assigned to key hydrological indicators, which are computed using the soil and water assessment tool. Entropy-based weighting reveals that groundwater-related components contribute more to overall vulnerability than surface runoff. According to initial MCDM analysis, the most vulnerable areas are those in the upper reaches of the watershed, where steep slopes accelerate runoff and limit infiltration. This confounding influence of elevation is addressed by implementing topographic normalization and reevaluating subwatershed vulnerability while controlling for elevation bias. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating both hydrological and topographical factors into urban watershed vulnerability assessment and demonstrate the applicability of entropy-weighted MCDM to complex, data-scarce urban environments. The proposed framework is a replicable decision support tool for prioritizing hydrologically sensitive areas in intervention planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: