Cross-sectional study identifies digital eye strain issues in health-related populations, suggesting improved ergonomics may help.
Aim: We aimed to determine the awareness and practices regarding the use of digital devices (DD) among health-related populations. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The study population included faculty, students, and staff of a medical college. Informed consent was taken. Questions on ergonomic practices while using DD and ocular discomfort were asked. P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Among 452 participants, 385 (85.2%) were aged < 30 years. Males included 208 (46%) of the participants. A total of 173 (38.7%) follow 6-monthly eye checkups, 383 (84.7%) visit an ophthalmologist for their eye examination, and only 329 (72.8%) use refractive correction or protective glasses. Digital eye strain (DES) prevalence was 75.2%. Symptoms of DES were found to be musculoskeletal > ocular > accommodative. DES was associated with > 5 years of DD use ( P < 0.028), not using refractive correction ( P < 0.001), position ( P < 0.033), dull screen illuminations ( P < 0.0177), decreased image clarity after prolonged use ( P < 0.0001), and a long frequency of breaks ( P < 0.001). Distance from the eye to DD was not statistically associated with DES ( P = 0.953), but its correlation was inversely related. The most common gadget used was mobile phone 399 (88.2%), and the interface used was touch screen 408 (90.3%). A total of 344 (76.1%) feel that digital screens affect their life, and 375 (83%) were willing to decrease screen timing. Also, 251 (55.5%) know about the 20–20–20 rule. Conclusions: Excessive use of DD leads to various health issues among health-related populations. Awareness and ergonomics practices would improve theirs as well as others’ health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: