This article demonstrates the benefits of tourism clustering for regional development in Ukraine, suggesting EU practices may enhance local competitiveness.
This article explores the concept and practical implementation of tourism clustering as a strategic model for organizing tourism activities in the context of global competition and regional development. It highlights the critical role of tourism in the economic systems of countries and regions, especially in Ukraine, where the tourism industry faces considerable challenges due to economic instability, devaluation of the national currency, and ongoing military conflict. The article defines the essence of a tourism cluster as a territorially concentrated system of enterprises that interact to create a competitive tourism product. The structural composition of clusters is analyzed, focusing on the four main sectors: core tourism service providers, supporting infrastructure, complementary services, and life-support coordination systems. The typologies of clusters proposed by Ukrainian economist S. Sokolenko and Hong Kong professor M. Enright are compared and applied to the Ukrainian tourism context. The paper provides a detailed review of European Union policies on cluster development in tourism and recreation, analyzing key strategic documents such as the “Europe 2020” agenda and the “European Cluster Memorandum.” Particular attention is paid to the role of public-private partnerships, multi-actor cooperation models, and thematic clusters (e.g., wellness, gastronomy, cultural tourism) that are actively supported in EU member states like Italy, Denmark, Germany, and Austria. The findings emphasize the substantial benefits of clustering: enhanced innovation, productivity, quality of services, increased investment appeal, and job creation. The article underscores the importance of adapting EU clustering practices to Ukrainian realities while taking into account regional disparities and the need for legislative and institutional frameworks. Recommendations are offered for implementing tourism clustering in Ukraine through mechanisms based on social partnership among government authorities, businesses, and civil society institutions. Special attention is given to the development of monitoring systems, evaluation tools, and sustainable strategies for cluster performance. The article concludes that clustering is not only a means of boosting competitiveness but also a powerful tool for regional socio-economic revitalization and integration into the European tourism space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaikalov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: