Retrospective analysis shows mNGS outperforms traditional culture in COVID-19, suggesting improved pathogen detection.
Abstract This retrospective study compared metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and traditional culture for pathogen detection in 43 patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), including 34 COVID-19 cases (14 critical, 20 non-critical) and 9 non-COVID controls. mNGS demonstrated superior sensitivity (95.35% vs. 81.08%) and broader pathogen coverage, identifying 36.36% of bacteria and 74.07% of fungi detected by cultures. Concordance between methods was observed in 63% of cases. Severe COVID-19 patients exhibited reduced respiratory microbiota abundance, potentially linked to viral dominance or therapeutic interventions. Clinical outcomes correlated positively with inflammatory markers (PCT, N-proBNP, neutrophils, LDH, NLR) and negatively with lymphocytes, highlighting systemic inflammation’s role in disease progression. While mNGS offers rapid, high-sensitivity pathogen profiling, limitations include small sample sizes, unresolved specificity concerns and unmeasured confounders . The study underscores mNGS as a promising tool for LRTI diagnosis in COVID-19, though larger prospective cohorts and standardized outcome metrics are needed to validate clinical utility, optimize interpretation, and address cost-effectiveness compared to conventional methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: